The results of the introduction of twisted pine (Pinus contorta) in Bolshoy Solovetsky Island

Autorzy

• Alexandr Sobolev Solovetsky State Historical, Architectural and Natural Museum Reserve, Bay Blagopoluchiya, Solovetsky Village, Primorsky District, Arkhangelsk Region, 164070, Russian Federation
• Pavel Feklistov Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research named after N.P. Laverov, Northern Dvina 23, Arkhangelsk, 163000, Russian Federation, phone: +79021908550, e-mail: feklistov@narfu.ru; pfeklistov@yandex.ru
• Ivan Bolotov Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research named after N.P. Laverov, Northern Dvina 23, Arkhangelsk, 163000, Russian Federation
• Oksana Barzut North (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Northern Dvina 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation

Abstract

In the central part of the Bolshoy Solovetsky Island, in the same type of growing conditions, two plots were created in 1988: the first consisted of twisted pine (Pinus contorta Loud. var. latifolia S. Wats) crops and the second one was of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The aim of the study was to establish the morphological parameters of the twisted pine and its growth in the conditions of the Bolshoy Solovetsky Island in comparison with the native species P. sylvestris L. Also, we aimed to identify the features of P. contorta var. latifolia and determine the possibility and necessity of further introduction of the species. The preservation of the twisted pine and scots pine cultures was determined. Accounting trees were selected (62 and 31 trees, respectively), in which morphometric indicators were measured. Wood samples (cores) were taken from them with an age drill to measure radial growth. The radial increment was measured using the MBS-9 microscope and the Lintab device. To measure the increase in height, six medium-sized model trees were cut down. According to the taxation indicators, the two types differed slightly and the differences were most often unreliable. The average height of the twisted pine trees was significantly higher compared to that of Scots pine. The thickness of the bark varied; on average, at the age of 18, it was 1.35 ± 0.038 mm for twisted pine and 1.86 ± 0.095 for Scots pine, that is, the native pine bark was 38% thicker. Typical for twisted pine were a significant number of pathologies noted in 22% of the studied trees.
Twisted pine was distinguished by a stronger development of the assimilation apparatus: the number of branches of the first order, the number of branches in the whorl, the life span of needles. An increase in radius (the width of the annual ring) was observed at 14–15 years, and then with age, the value decreased in twisted pine and remained at a consistently high level in Scots pine. The width of the late zone of the annual ring was 12% in Scots pine and 14% in twisted pine; but at a young age, the late wood in twisted pine was very small. The increase in height of the twisted pine was on average less than that of Scots pine. The dependence of the trunk volume on the diameter was almost identical in both species.

Keywords

• twisted pine
• late wood
• assimilation apparatus
• pathologies
• diameter
• tree-ring width
• height
• Scots pine